Today I was reading some newspapers on the internet and came across this interview with Senator Bernie Sanders. The
Lord by Senator Bernie Sanders is the United States of America by
Vermont and a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for Vermont.
I liked the text and the subject that I long time i have left to defend, or chat. A
subject that even Fidel Castro in an interview in European newspapers
in 2010, argued that the United States of America should spend time to
analyze and put into practice immediately.Why? at the time I could not see why in a critical vision I could explain about it. Now I could understand the Senator after this remark, a Social Democrat in the country.Read
the short text of the interview and then I put my review of what I find
beautiful in the observation and the problem itself, the delay in the
implementation of something necessary.Bernie Sanders Uses Obamacare Decision to Call for Medicare for All
By Jason Easley - June , 2012
Bernie Sanders praised the Affordable Care Act as important step in the right direction towards a Medicare for all system.
http://www.politicususa.com/bernie-sanders-obamacare-decision-call-medicare.html
It was one of the most protracted transitions I've seen in terms of administration. Rather, public administration. In 1978 when I started working in a multinational industry (Italian) all information that I had watched my late father had given me a European multinational and heavy industry was changing. My dad always worked on life in German multinationals, small and ever since I saw the traditional actions of multinationals. Attempt to design group that is part of the company, the benefits to workers, the holiday season, clubs, and various other administrative topics. One of the things that were always watched the trucks of companies. And the company I had just begun were all parked and rusting. At that moment I began to learn that the industries were taking the course to have its own separate fleet of trucks. They were choosing to hire companies to transport their cargo. They ended up discovering the advantages and then declared himself a trend is an experience. Years later there was only one multinational adopting the system of transfer of responsibility for spending on one of the administrative domain, which was transporting its cargo produced for other companies, like almost every branch of industry was adopting this system, a new born market, it was the charge transport outsourced.The word outsourcing was taking strong direction, and by inference in transportation took a dramatic force. The transition took about 3-4 years. In the 80 already saw a lot of people wanting to start a small business to stay next to a large company and enjoy the new direction of outsourcing.Another important event that I attended and spoke often with professionals on the subject. It was the transition of large banks and small banks. I had a friend who was beginning to grow, it was just a manager of a bank financial options substantially large, and before he became the general manager of the bank on a national level, we talked a lot. And what was talked small banks and large banks make entering the association, a trend that happened in the United States of America and was spreading around the world. Or the large state banks to become private banks. It did not take much more than five years.since the 90's there was the great beginning of mergers between large groups or holding, in little more than four years all firms were becoming new fruit fusions. The company I started working already lived this kind of condition the merger, the problem is that this merger was not only the merger of the company but also the fusion of industries. It was the fusion of a chemical company with a pharmaceutical company and a veterinary pharmaceutical company. Tried to protect the large energetic crisis, the crisis caused by the Persian Gulf War in the 70s.Now what I find interesting is the system Medico public and private not be the target administrative public investment. Have you started to listen to this need. Perhaps an improved awareness of public administration who specializes in spending money on public works that often people do not use, or in various investments that may not even after death to realize that people go there. Besides manufacturing exuberant public fees or taxes as a source of revenue in the sense against overspending logical control of spending. The on taxation makes the population is common, and simple to be hurt by losing all feeling in the hand of the taxes. And the industry to lose almost all the profit in computing taxes and more taxes every year that passes and still have to ensure that losses in its balance sheet the cost of medical care for its employees as a rule of benefits for the staff member feel good and with pleasure in the industry.The discussion has already taken more than seven years, but reached to discuss plans outside the normal range.What was once a typical speech from left political ideological (left my adolescence was clear within the communist vision, seeing that there was the Communists violent and nonviolent. Communists Marxists. And the communists maomisties. And that made a difference because some were supporters of the diffusion separation of people, and that was the maomisties. Or some were supporters of the reforms in hand together with armed attacks to draw attention) the various countries which had their respective communist parties held in their rhetoric the absence of concern with the health care worker. It was commonplace in expression, we knew trademark of the communist parties, are Europeans or Latin.That is: I'm sorry. I was a skinny kid, and I was 14. And he found boring. And laugh at their faces.
The health of the worker!
From time to time I listened with a certain Italian accent saying that. And I said to myself, but as this woman is annoying! This speech is weak.
They did not want to pay attention to what she was learning.I just hope that the founder of a newspaper, from somewhere, do not read and do not want to meet me, after this revelation of what was in my silent smile. I think she is a bit sensitive. And I always hid the reason I laugh at their faces.
Today I see this speech the old, and I see this article, I'm happy. The right direction begins to take more intelligent.I never said I was stupid laugh, I just found them ridiculous. I was wrong, they were intelligent, and I was naive.But the right was not stupid, was naive.The collective emotional victory not only with sounds and words, is won with concrete actions. One talked too much, and one said nothing but did nothing. Appeared to make their political representation and went back to their respective companies handle your real sources of income. This was the naivety. They speculated political force, but left the "ridiculous" to seize the shares.Today, at least they seem to be less naive. They decided to do.The United States was right even though its "said left."It is still right? Perhaps this distinction no longer exists. What matters is that everybody wants to have profit. The practice is capitalist everywhere.The Cold War had this speculation: the practice or not for profit.
But they were the Right, the Rights of the smaller countries, is mirrored in their actions, be them or are European (former Western Europe also right by the will of the profit as a goal). And they, in my view naive.
And the ingenuity was the Health and Education. How boring I called those who were teaching in the health education of the worker was dismissed, and blah blah blah blah, and the lesson went away and we wanted to leave.
The Right to Education paid and they were speaking to the Left. Recalling that education is widespread in the context. Although we do not accept the university had a lot of built investment cost of the right. She saw the need for universities to a skilled workforce, labor independence and How Now international, and often the right international investing in small countries. It was a generalization on all levels but was trying to build something right to stay quiet. But all Nives of Education only learned to catch and convert the investment in a speech to the Left. Sometimes invented slander or lies right in the classroom or laboratory made by the Right.So I laughed and was upset some of the naivety of others.
After I saw the newspapers, and television speech of the Right, I leave to walk home laughing. They did not learn.
I call it naive because my blog is educated.Error of the Left? To find that though I was laughing and calling the right of this naive I was making a left.
I would say I have no words for what I remember from the left. He thought wrong. I was away. To tell the truth, what interested me was the girls from the Left. (They say the left, made propaganda for the left, carrying badges left. And as the Right would not let me get close, I just went around the left because of them. That's it.
Once the speech has improved the Right. Resolved, speak your projects and deploy them. They are thinking more in its smallest entrepreneurs seeking a Taxation. Why? Give chance to gain employment and to workers.
Despite the partisan distinctions, began under Sr. Bush, and continues under Sr. Obama. Its companies want to put the unemployed to work.
In Europe the discourse of Social Welfare is already old, already talking about the taxation, at least I see it in Germany with Mrs. Merkel's speech concerned the Greens over the pro taxation.
Finally seeing the distinction in industrial competition, the countries that comprise the industrial production and world think better solve their speeches.
Now a North American political left to analyze it and give the name "Right learned" is the beginning of what may be called to turn the trends of popular actions and not populist.A slow transition, but what is happening. Fees and Public Health. Something that only the Left did.
Times are changing.
Good Week
Benedito Ubirata
It was one of the most protracted transitions I've seen in terms of administration. Rather, public administration. In 1978 when I started working in a multinational industry (Italian) all information that I had watched my late father had given me a European multinational and heavy industry was changing. My dad always worked on life in German multinationals, small and ever since I saw the traditional actions of multinationals. Attempt to design group that is part of the company, the benefits to workers, the holiday season, clubs, and various other administrative topics. One of the things that were always watched the trucks of companies. And the company I had just begun were all parked and rusting. At that moment I began to learn that the industries were taking the course to have its own separate fleet of trucks. They were choosing to hire companies to transport their cargo. They ended up discovering the advantages and then declared himself a trend is an experience. Years later there was only one multinational adopting the system of transfer of responsibility for spending on one of the administrative domain, which was transporting its cargo produced for other companies, like almost every branch of industry was adopting this system, a new born market, it was the charge transport outsourced.The word outsourcing was taking strong direction, and by inference in transportation took a dramatic force. The transition took about 3-4 years. In the 80 already saw a lot of people wanting to start a small business to stay next to a large company and enjoy the new direction of outsourcing.Another important event that I attended and spoke often with professionals on the subject. It was the transition of large banks and small banks. I had a friend who was beginning to grow, it was just a manager of a bank financial options substantially large, and before he became the general manager of the bank on a national level, we talked a lot. And what was talked small banks and large banks make entering the association, a trend that happened in the United States of America and was spreading around the world. Or the large state banks to become private banks. It did not take much more than five years.since the 90's there was the great beginning of mergers between large groups or holding, in little more than four years all firms were becoming new fruit fusions. The company I started working already lived this kind of condition the merger, the problem is that this merger was not only the merger of the company but also the fusion of industries. It was the fusion of a chemical company with a pharmaceutical company and a veterinary pharmaceutical company. Tried to protect the large energetic crisis, the crisis caused by the Persian Gulf War in the 70s.Now what I find interesting is the system Medico public and private not be the target administrative public investment. Have you started to listen to this need. Perhaps an improved awareness of public administration who specializes in spending money on public works that often people do not use, or in various investments that may not even after death to realize that people go there. Besides manufacturing exuberant public fees or taxes as a source of revenue in the sense against overspending logical control of spending. The on taxation makes the population is common, and simple to be hurt by losing all feeling in the hand of the taxes. And the industry to lose almost all the profit in computing taxes and more taxes every year that passes and still have to ensure that losses in its balance sheet the cost of medical care for its employees as a rule of benefits for the staff member feel good and with pleasure in the industry.The discussion has already taken more than seven years, but reached to discuss plans outside the normal range.What was once a typical speech from left political ideological (left my adolescence was clear within the communist vision, seeing that there was the Communists violent and nonviolent. Communists Marxists. And the communists maomisties. And that made a difference because some were supporters of the diffusion separation of people, and that was the maomisties. Or some were supporters of the reforms in hand together with armed attacks to draw attention) the various countries which had their respective communist parties held in their rhetoric the absence of concern with the health care worker. It was commonplace in expression, we knew trademark of the communist parties, are Europeans or Latin.That is: I'm sorry. I was a skinny kid, and I was 14. And he found boring. And laugh at their faces.
The health of the worker!
From time to time I listened with a certain Italian accent saying that. And I said to myself, but as this woman is annoying! This speech is weak.
They did not want to pay attention to what she was learning.I just hope that the founder of a newspaper, from somewhere, do not read and do not want to meet me, after this revelation of what was in my silent smile. I think she is a bit sensitive. And I always hid the reason I laugh at their faces.
Today I see this speech the old, and I see this article, I'm happy. The right direction begins to take more intelligent.I never said I was stupid laugh, I just found them ridiculous. I was wrong, they were intelligent, and I was naive.But the right was not stupid, was naive.The collective emotional victory not only with sounds and words, is won with concrete actions. One talked too much, and one said nothing but did nothing. Appeared to make their political representation and went back to their respective companies handle your real sources of income. This was the naivety. They speculated political force, but left the "ridiculous" to seize the shares.Today, at least they seem to be less naive. They decided to do.The United States was right even though its "said left."It is still right? Perhaps this distinction no longer exists. What matters is that everybody wants to have profit. The practice is capitalist everywhere.The Cold War had this speculation: the practice or not for profit.
But they were the Right, the Rights of the smaller countries, is mirrored in their actions, be them or are European (former Western Europe also right by the will of the profit as a goal). And they, in my view naive.
And the ingenuity was the Health and Education. How boring I called those who were teaching in the health education of the worker was dismissed, and blah blah blah blah, and the lesson went away and we wanted to leave.
The Right to Education paid and they were speaking to the Left. Recalling that education is widespread in the context. Although we do not accept the university had a lot of built investment cost of the right. She saw the need for universities to a skilled workforce, labor independence and How Now international, and often the right international investing in small countries. It was a generalization on all levels but was trying to build something right to stay quiet. But all Nives of Education only learned to catch and convert the investment in a speech to the Left. Sometimes invented slander or lies right in the classroom or laboratory made by the Right.So I laughed and was upset some of the naivety of others.
After I saw the newspapers, and television speech of the Right, I leave to walk home laughing. They did not learn.
I call it naive because my blog is educated.Error of the Left? To find that though I was laughing and calling the right of this naive I was making a left.
I would say I have no words for what I remember from the left. He thought wrong. I was away. To tell the truth, what interested me was the girls from the Left. (They say the left, made propaganda for the left, carrying badges left. And as the Right would not let me get close, I just went around the left because of them. That's it.
Once the speech has improved the Right. Resolved, speak your projects and deploy them. They are thinking more in its smallest entrepreneurs seeking a Taxation. Why? Give chance to gain employment and to workers.
Despite the partisan distinctions, began under Sr. Bush, and continues under Sr. Obama. Its companies want to put the unemployed to work.
In Europe the discourse of Social Welfare is already old, already talking about the taxation, at least I see it in Germany with Mrs. Merkel's speech concerned the Greens over the pro taxation.
Finally seeing the distinction in industrial competition, the countries that comprise the industrial production and world think better solve their speeches.
Now a North American political left to analyze it and give the name "Right learned" is the beginning of what may be called to turn the trends of popular actions and not populist.A slow transition, but what is happening. Fees and Public Health. Something that only the Left did.
Times are changing.
Good Week
No comments:
Post a Comment