I was reading some interesting articles on the internet and suddenly came across some stories in foreign newspapers and U.S. and decided to pay attention in case of the Department of Justice of the United States on a case of Wire Fraud. This led me to think about some incidents that occurred last year when I was looking for an explanation for a term not know it was considered cool, which was the term Social Shock.
Suddenly I remembered that in some websites, I read the Court, some jurists and panelists talked very few cases in which the Supreme Court was having problems with a social dysfunction, which I consider an exchange of values. That is, they were struggling to find effective way to stop many organs of public communication does not use the Social Commotion in order to let the people and the judiciary conditioning to their will. That is, if they detain a focus on something and a verdict they lead to social upheaval as a way of making you have to give the verdict to be relevant to the case.
This was much debated in the newspapers printed line last year, with some cases up to me and many laughed at the bars and pubs in the country. In the television media has reached the point of participating in federal operations already holding in its editorial operations for the submission of a verdict which clearly bore the audience or the people have directed their idea of the guilt of who was being investigated. This they termed also as Social Shock.
In one case the former chairman of the Supreme Court, the Minister Gilmar Mendes last year (2009) discussed a case of effusive social upheaval with an operation of the federal police and a television network in the case of Brazilian research. He and some lawyers on various Web sites that contained the subject in a specific way, they could not accept an organ not only the executive organ as a particular implement indirect forces to the Judiciary to conduct a verdict.
In this respect, all they talked about it, in the country by the “common people”, but were stunned by what happened, except when that same minister, months later ended up being involved in a case of espionage on his person, so illegal, and conducted by elements of the Federal Police and the involvement at the invitation of the former, some elements of ABIN (something not accounted for by the Federal Police accused of spying) that ultimately the defendants were dismissed by the Federal Police, because until then there was an increase in stock wrong of the accused, with involvement in a strike server security of the country and agreements with various political, amazing everyone, because the agreements were enemies of political parties to each other by the same person. It was very much discussed in newspapers and was therefore the same place the entire population perplexed how something so delicate and powerful in a democracy the Supreme Court could be violated. And the worst thing in the end the accused can claim his candidacy the legislative body in the country by state or federal. Many said that the pursuit of this candidacy was just told to get the much discussed and has parliamentary immunity, since after that assumed that all processes and administrative and criminais could happen.
But regardless, it was a real sensation in the bars of the country. Because everyone can speak as a police spy illegally a member of the Supreme Court? Soon these professionals, who are at risk for criminal and administrative proceedings, and has a high probability of needing an endorsement in the future of the Supreme Court, that is the last resort in order to clear them?
After this event all the more simple and popular members of the people, gave several adjectives illegal operation, discreet and polite (I think, do not read thoughts anyway), after all it was a Federal Officer, imagine if he was laughing the way they are things in this country? Besides these more traditional cults and members were satisfied and less playful with the action resulting from the direction of the Federal Police …
Spacing Delegate!
And I repeat to us the least, the laughter was mild after a Federal Officer.
But back to the beginning of the article about the FBI Wire Fraud, which is a crime involving U.S. federal crimes on the facts of electronic communications, and use these practices to put a case in due order. I think we could discuss more on this subject, thus avoiding lengthy discussions and public statements of people upset by things that happen in public be it stamp Judicial, Legislative or Executive, and at the end when some organs are public and private end hiding in impunity.
Why wonder that there are better-built, any organ or person with tools and purchasing power for such investment does not feel restrained to circumvent democracy that everyone can have and deserve. Maybe reduce the publication of truthful reportage novels in criminal investigation, but instead would transcendecem reports that more reliability and acceptability in the general power in the country
I believe that more should be discussed and studied in universities in order to start to push the whole complex of Elite of opinion as to the construction of such devices already configured in this crime law in the United States and other countries around the world. Taking so, for example a case happened, the discussion that I believe this problem indirectly, by some senators in Congress, as was last year that press freedom should end or not. Sometimes the senator may have been victimized in the past to build a Social Shock and for not having devices that would support was intended to only make statements of displeasure to a false liberty, who can manipulate information.
Freedom can exist within a narrow parameter of Rights.
I believe that the Wire Fraud promotes the breakdown of the use of freedom of information without having to leave the traditional journalistic or other investigations to be only with the use of the sources interviewed. Without the use of instrumentation insubordinate and power tools for about sources or sources of research. Be it pre or post the investigative act to drive an already absurd, freedom of information.
Namely, it is also subject, as the researcher got the product.
This should be a goal of the study and construction for this decade. Since that last only here in Brazil we had over the use of these types of interventions to the pursuit of investigative products to reach the freedom of information.
Good week
Benedict Ubiratã
Note for those who want to better understand Wire Fraud click the link below and understand more deeply.
————————————————– ———————–
Federal Wire Fraud Crimes
March 4, 2008 By McNabb Associates, PC
http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=5068
————————————————– ————————
Undercover Operation Nabs Market Insiders and Promoters in Penny Stock Market Sting
http://miami.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel10/mm100710.htm
—————————————————————————
No comments:
Post a Comment