This is a great case (Below is the beginning of the case to the Supreme Court, 1904 North American and the link with the rest of the written case.).
That's what I call numbers that you hear in collective emotional and a problem that is observed in emopcional collective. But what else could be observed in the posters of the Americans in 2011 at the strike of Wal street ( I saw the Facebook photos of North American citizens who put what they saw strange , eg complaints or strange to them , or consistent with fear and indignation of them ) . The posters and shouting was the collective outrage of something or they are afraid to speak , or else they are within a deviation of attention to something that afflicts : A country of inventions in history have the loss of intellectual property , including the right Capitalism .
In previous posts I have already quoted the former supreme court cases North America ( one on child slavery in 1920) , cases that can be called classics . I think this case is a classic case that gives social psychology and social psychiatry have as an example to investigate whether there is the fear of the U.S. population and the rest of the world that have contact with them .
The advantage is that one can check whether the numbers that represent the case that the numbers are not always speak the year around and no one can understand. One can not forget the power of the collective unconscious to put numbers and words but failing to express explanation but let people restless .
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=192&invol=543
v.
FREDERICK I. ALLEN, Commissioner of Patents.
No. 383.
Argued January 12, 13, 1904.
Decided February 23, 1904.
This is a petition in mandamus filed in the supreme court of the District of Columbia to compel the Commissioner of [192 U.S. 543, 544] Patents to require the primary examiner to forward an appeal, prayed by the petitioner, to the board of examiners-in-chief, to review the ruling of the primary examiner requiring petitioner to cancel certain of his claims in his application for motor meters.
The supreme court dismissed the petition, and its action was affirmed by the court of appeals. This writ of error was then sued out.
The decision of the primary examiner was based upon rule 41 of practice in the Patent Office, and the case involves the validity of the rule under the patent laws.
The petitioner filed an application in the Patent Office, November 21, 1896, for a patent for 'certain new and useful improvements in motor meters.' He expressed his invention in thirteen claims. They are inserted in the margin.
1. The herein-described method of measuring alternating electric currents, which consists in setting up or establishing a shifting field of magnetism from three intersecting lines or axes of magnetism and adapted to actuate a rotatable armature in a motor meter arranged within the energizing coils producing said lines of magnetization.
2. The herein-described method of actuating an alternating-current motor meter, which consists in setting up or establishing a shifting field of magnetism from three intersecting lines or axes of magnetization, and adapted to actuate a rotatable armature arranged within the energizing coils producing said lines of magnetization. ....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Proteus_Steinmetz
Good Weekend
Benedito Ubirata da Silva
That's what I call numbers that you hear in collective emotional and a problem that is observed in emopcional collective. But what else could be observed in the posters of the Americans in 2011 at the strike of Wal street ( I saw the Facebook photos of North American citizens who put what they saw strange , eg complaints or strange to them , or consistent with fear and indignation of them ) . The posters and shouting was the collective outrage of something or they are afraid to speak , or else they are within a deviation of attention to something that afflicts : A country of inventions in history have the loss of intellectual property , including the right Capitalism .
In previous posts I have already quoted the former supreme court cases North America ( one on child slavery in 1920) , cases that can be called classics . I think this case is a classic case that gives social psychology and social psychiatry have as an example to investigate whether there is the fear of the U.S. population and the rest of the world that have contact with them .
The advantage is that one can check whether the numbers that represent the case that the numbers are not always speak the year around and no one can understand. One can not forget the power of the collective unconscious to put numbers and words but failing to express explanation but let people restless .
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=192&invol=543
U.S. Supreme Court
U S EX REL STEINMETZ v. ALLEN, 192 U.S. 543 (1904)
192 U.S. 543 UNITED STATES ex rel. CHARLES P. STEINMETZ, Plff. in Err.,v.
FREDERICK I. ALLEN, Commissioner of Patents.
No. 383.
Argued January 12, 13, 1904.
Decided February 23, 1904.
This is a petition in mandamus filed in the supreme court of the District of Columbia to compel the Commissioner of [192 U.S. 543, 544] Patents to require the primary examiner to forward an appeal, prayed by the petitioner, to the board of examiners-in-chief, to review the ruling of the primary examiner requiring petitioner to cancel certain of his claims in his application for motor meters.
The supreme court dismissed the petition, and its action was affirmed by the court of appeals. This writ of error was then sued out.
The decision of the primary examiner was based upon rule 41 of practice in the Patent Office, and the case involves the validity of the rule under the patent laws.
The petitioner filed an application in the Patent Office, November 21, 1896, for a patent for 'certain new and useful improvements in motor meters.' He expressed his invention in thirteen claims. They are inserted in the margin.
1. The herein-described method of measuring alternating electric currents, which consists in setting up or establishing a shifting field of magnetism from three intersecting lines or axes of magnetism and adapted to actuate a rotatable armature in a motor meter arranged within the energizing coils producing said lines of magnetization.
2. The herein-described method of actuating an alternating-current motor meter, which consists in setting up or establishing a shifting field of magnetism from three intersecting lines or axes of magnetization, and adapted to actuate a rotatable armature arranged within the energizing coils producing said lines of magnetization. ....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Proteus_Steinmetz
Good Weekend
Benedito Ubirata da Silva
No comments:
Post a Comment