A good text. But the analyst forgets the topics of economic capacity to maintain a war against an insurgency or so distant from the country of origin of the country that attacks or defends. There was the 2009 crisis, the economic restoration of North American in 2010. The output of the recession in 2010-2011. And bear the expenses of a counter insurgency or war so far from home can be much more negative than can be calculated. At the time the Bush administration, analysts speculated that despite the war for the U.S. market and English would be advantageous, by a factor of publicizing the use of new weapons and in consequence the acquisition of new contracts for the sale of weapons of war. Last year economic analysis of texts on the North American recession, criticized the United States of America, the factor can generate a lot of money on arms sales to the country, but the defense industry did not generate the necessary jobs. They who wrote the texts of German origin, considered not as advantageous to the war industry as a good business. The war generation would favor the defense industry, but did not favor the recession. If this country has to go home, at least half a million men enlisted and assets would have to have jobs. The return home should happen to be careful not to spend outside the country stable and have a recession at home. The paper analyzes the need and aggressiveness in the regions mentioned but not seen the need to remain stable before the world economy since the country's stability.The text does not observe the disturbances that concern the high command of the war the U.S. of A as the probability of regions like Central America, South America and problems are direct and indirect domestic problems the country.In the Middle East is highlighted with the terrorism that Al Qaeda attacked the region of eastern North America, with the fall of the towers full of people. Coward an attack that had to be retaliated.But the problem of drug trafficking in the region of Brazil, Colombia and Venezuela, but all the problems that arise in the region of Mexico on the drug, show that terrorism can be favored with the entry of the drug to children and young people creating a North American terrorism in country's future. Maybe they retreat to retaliate which has these two continents that spoil the vision of peace in the country's future. His youth consumes Weapon of self-destruction that the Narco traffickers and corrupt politicians who are interested in North American finance anti rhetoric leave propagate into the North American territory.Increasingly, states are left with eyes closed to the drug industry to increase and settle south of the North American continent. Opening risks to Mexico, Canada and United States of America and Europe to its west if they went completely in the North American territory.The danger lies south of the North American continent. And you can not fail, because the institutionalization of narco trafficking is increasingly strong, and perhaps end up financing the Al Qaeda corrupt governments to stop the growing drug trade as a weapon for the destruction of the North America.Al Qaeda has outbreaks in Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina and the millions of dollars to billions of dollars they manage to sustain a war in Afghanistan and still hostilities trillions of U.S. dollars in Iraq, but can support governments in Latin American production and to institutionalize distribution of the drug the weapon against the Americans.The text should provide this kind of concern.With the financial crisis in Latin America, increasing the danger to occur keep Al Qaeda from the governments of the region to collaborate with American rhetoric anti north this growing and more visible. The crimes happen more and more politicians. Political activists are increasingly harassed by entities government this continent and almost all are vehemently to the growth of drug trafficking and the activity of anti North American rhetoric. Increasingly the government arrests and executes and kills North American pro social activist who has speeches and anti drug anti Al Qaeda.If the U.S. government not to return with his troops, he might win an insurgency triggered to divert attention from a plane visible weakening of the southern boundary of the North America.They should think more about the error text.