Reduce UK military ability?

I decided to write a repeat blog, which I wrote as a comment In British Force News about the interview, Department Of Defense of the United States with the former Mr. Robert Gates

Gates: Cuts 'reduce UK military ability'
Thursday, January 16, 2014 | UK, Worldwide

Gates: Cuts 'reduce UK military ability'

Thursday, January 16, 2014 | UK, Worldwide

- See more at: http://web202.ssvc.com/news/articles/army/2025#sthash.oqutXS5x.dpuf

Spending cuts have reduced the UK 's ability to be a "full partner" to the United States across the whole range of military operations, a former US Defence Secretary has said.
Robert Gates highlighted the decision which has left the Royal Navy without an operational aircraft carrier as an example of the erosion of "full spectrum capabilities" in the British armed forces.
Mr Gates, who served under presidents Barack Obama and George Bush, said he lamented cuts in defence spending on both sides of the Atlantic.
- See more at: http://web202.ssvc.com/news/articles/army/2025#sthash.oqutXS5x.dpuf

Spending cuts have reduced the UK 's ability to be a "full partner" to the United States across the whole range of military operations, a former US Defence Secretary has said.

Robert Gates highlighted the decision which has left the Royal Navy without an operational aircraft carrier as an example of the erosion of "full spectrum capabilities" in the British armed forces.

Mr Gates, who served under presidents Barack Obama and George Bush, said he lamented cuts in defence spending on both sides of the Atlantic.


- See more at: http://web202.ssvc.com/news/articles/army/2025#sthash.oqutXS5x.dpuf





In my view Mr Robert Gates is right . The problems in the Middle East are not only harmful to the United States of America . There are events in history that leads to realize that the problems are not only north american . Comodo the United States would solve the problem solitude and rest does not mean that the enemy was the enemy . You let the enemy have only the view that only the United States was the enemy . If there is a " probability" ( and there is a likelihood of many that are part of Al Qaeda ) the enemy manages to resurface , the idea is that at least it is not only against the United States of America , the hatred of retaliation exist .
The historical facts show that they acted not only against the United States of America . A while ago I was talking to myself , that the problems of Al Qaeda has not only a focus. But if one day be needed more than an intrusion , it would be in several places simultaneously , or in sequence to the next . As an example Afghanistan and Libya . He gave no time to the problem Libio growing, not waited for the end of the invasion of Afghanistan . That changed , influence the world for the better? Yes, it was a surprise . The enemy does not like surprises , they are paranoid , they want to know in advance whether they will be invaded ( I have to laugh , in military language the enemy invasion antecendencia want with a gun in military parlance , it's amazing, really makes me laugh at them so much paranoia . and that's good , they're going crazy , they do not have the calm of the 70s with the terrorist attacks and horrified us and them laughing ) .
 But turning the vision of Mr. Robert Gates , shows a distribution strategy . Do not give the enemy the perception that if one goes to a place the other can go elsewhere . If the UK pulls . When the United States of America want to do a job in the Middle East , the enemy immediately deduct that may be victim UK elsewhere. Part of the surprise is over. If the two go together, there is the minimizing of costs , and decide to do after an operation in the Middle East , or at the same time elsewhere prevent the enemy will not know . This is aggressive , as they deserve .


Hugs

Benedito Ubirata da Silva