A good movie and good times

A good movie is always good to be remembered. With Slick tires, well-kept old engines, places that remind us of good times, and friendly people. This was the United States in the 1970s.
Vide trailler a good movie

and another trailler with Dennis Wilson

Be sure to note the rather odd error of distinct release dates. One 1971 and another 1970, if you look at that makes a difference. Who remembers Apollo 11 and NASA concerned about the Apollo project?
Was it in 1973 or 1969?
This is the problem with releases with different date.


Besides, good times.

Hugs

Benedito Ubirata da Silva

Drinking water

It seems a disconnected subject. But one day observing a young man's question, I laughed.

He asked, that if he was afraid of the heat of a lot of hot cast iron, by the time he stood in the front, he would fear the hot cast iron would dry him out. I laughed.Only dry if you stop drinking water.

An ironworker, whether woman or man, does not have her genital parts dried up. They get exposed to worse than hot cast iron. It is exposed to melting iron, melted, reddish.He sweats.He drinks water as a consequence and has the humidity of the body always regular. That is, the vagina had remained moist, the eyes were still damp, and the stomach still had moisture. The water is replaced much more quickly and healthy.

See the United States, a metallurgical country, has one of the largest mechanical industries in the world.

I do not see any complaints from men with their dry interiors because they work in the front, sometimes almost against a heated cast iron. Sometimes he stays hours a span away. The only difference is that the motor has a battery electricity connected to it as it tests and repairs it. Without it it will be more beneficial still.

Now if you stay in the desert or on the beach in an extremely fine and dry sand. You'll be dry on the hour.

Even if you are in a non-hot region like heated cast iron on the stove after about 15 minutes, or a heated engine after about 15 minutes it will be 120 degrees.If you are in a sand, or very fine intense dust, extremely fine and dry, and being much less than 120 degrees Celsius, you will be totally dry in minutes.If Eat Corn starch, about 2 kilos without water, can be chilled. Or a few kilos of wheat flour, without water and ice. You will be so dry that you will see a doctor.

But a hammer of 2.5 kg putting on the stove, until reaching 120 degrees, or in 15 minutes of heating, with you next to some 30 cm of distance; That will not dry it out. Anything is just drinking water.But first notice, you did not dry out, just swept a little of the water contained in your body. When drinking water will only replace the little lost.

The interesting thing is that the water replenishment will be close to what you lost in the act of sweating, which is water stored in the body, undesirable gases to your body, and mobilization of the blood from the cold area of ​​your body to the heated area.

Radioactive decay of radioactive isotopes of Radioactive Small Half-Life; such as cobalt, iron, sodium, lithium, silicon, carbon and radioactive strontium, which depending on the living atmosphere, may contain in the surrounding air in the form of suspended particles) (remember how much the cast iron with a drop of tin of solder can decay these particles by the size of the 2.5 kg iron block by the size and quantity of particles which would be millions of times larger than the particle, so the iron and tin would do so. contain a leakage of radiation until the leak begins to fall. Lead or tin (since this is always mixed with tin plus lead, it absorbs all leaks until it can handle, which is not equal to the amount of leakage from a Nuclear Power plant.

In the air it only has small particles, to very small to Angstron size, against in the plant to have kilos of radioactive material to decay and even the lead bricks contain them.

Then just a hammer and a drop of solder on it letting it heat until it melted; is enough and left in volume and mass for the decay of only very small particles that in contact with the skin can rather irritate. A radioactive iron particle can make a person lose weight yes. The others each have an irritation in the body while it is radioactive, after decaying the body itself makes sure to put out of the corporeal system the small particle of Angstron in volume)What the iodine on top of the melted drop can make is the biggest show on the decay. If these elements have a simple ionic combination, for example fluorine, the iodine will play the role that for each unit it will have a body in volume enough to do absorption. After all, iodine is higher than fluorine. In the air you will hardly find beyond fluoride combined with these. Astatine would have a half-life even if sustained by other radiation a half-life time so small that soon it would decay to iodine. 

It would be so heavy that a cloud would not carry it with such ease. But fluoride, that would be light enough to accompany the cloud together with the elements in suspension. a thing similar to Van der Waals' link, where the attraction of one keeps it unbound, closer, and if one suspends and walks the other accompanies it. 

The iodine would leave the fluoride separated from the elements containing it by size. 

The elements would not take him and the fluoride would decay.So a drop of iodine will do the rest of the work. 

If at the end the air is clean the drop of evaporated iodine will do a good job of cleaning the environment.

Note: I deduce how much the person would feel good in those days of heavy air, with a high pollution, and 3 hammers of these one on top of the other (crushed) in a mouth of the stove heating until able to melt a piece of lead tin solder wire . turns off the stove, sits on a bench next to it and goes on feeling the body exhale start. Something interesting.

Hugs and Kisses

Benedito Ubirata da Silva

The summer of 1981

A song for those who do not remember the summer of 1981 or winter in the northern hemisphere.
When my friends warned me, some friends of the many that I certainly can not see anymore. The history of the world and its confusions.
A lot had changed, and our dreams were down. Of the various options of mating, sexual intercourse, emotional relationship the options would be diminished.
The pleasures of living next to people who like brown, with people who like green, or people who like red, with people who like pink would change.
The depiction of liking is just an almost accurate symbolism of the emotion of selection. But the genetic identification and its influences with the new discoveries of the 70s, and the difficulties of each place, with its ethnic racism, or worse, with its financial social racisms, or the worst for us in the 70s with racism politicians. Dreams could not be more fulfilled with achievements in relationships between human beings for emotional sexual purposes.
The distances, most in unsuitable places prevented this.
The best would be separation, and rearrangement.
We were silent. We're going home.
Only left for me to go to the beach, and watch the sunset.
And listen to this song. She remembered me well. And remember that:
Combinations were required, for marriage, with blood tests, long conversations to verify compatibility. The world and its aberrations of nature. What aberrations.

I had a friend who said: I was not born with glasses!
I said: My lung was made to breathe oxygen.
I wear glasses, she wears glasses today, and both of us breathe: Oxygen, wood dust, dirt dust, dirt, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and so on.
What is left?

Stevie Wonder - My Cherry Amour   

https://youtu.be/NW0YcO5P3OM

To adapt.

Al Green-Lets Stay Together   

https://youtu.be/COiIC3A0ROM

Bill Withers - Ain't No Sunshine   

https://youtu.be/tIdIqbv7SPo?list=RDCOiIC3A0ROM

Sade & Santana - why can't we live together   

https://youtu.be/UXn7jxPxAeM

 

Kisses


Benedito Ubirata da Silva

Depressed children respond differently to rewards than other kids

The  Scientist Magazine ...

Depressed children respond differently to rewards than other kids

December 15, 2016 | Jim Dryden, Washington University School of Medicine at St. Louis

dc15.16 deprchild.jpg 

A child wears a device that measures electrical activity in the brain when the child chooses between doors on a computer screen. Choosing one door wins points while the other results in a loss of points. Washington University researchers have found that the brains of children with depression don't react as robustly to success in the game. Their blunted reward response is a marker of clinical depression.

Credit: Robert Boston 

 

AddThis Sharing Buttons

Share to Facebook548Share to TwitterShare to Google+Share to EmailShare to RedditShare to More13

Brains react less robustly to success, rewards -
For many children, December often is linked to presents and excitement, but when a young child doesn't seem all that enthused about getting gifts, it could be a sign that something is wrong. Measuring brain waves, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have found that clinically depressed children don't respond to rewards the same way as other children do.

See Also: Research on normative brain development in children could help doctors test for depression

Previous research from the same group of scientists found that a reduced ability to experience joy is a key sign of clinical depression in young children. The findings in the new study could help explain the biological underpinnings of the earlier discovery.
"These findings may show us how the brain processes emotions in young children with depression," said senior investigator Joan L. Luby, MD, director of Washington University's Early Emotional Development Program. "The pleasure we derive from rewards—such as toys and gifts—motivates us to succeed and seek more rewards. Dampening the process early in development is a serious concern because it may carry over to how a person will approach rewarding tasks later in life."
The new findings are published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
"A blunted response to reward frequently is seen in the brains of depressed adults and adolescents," said first author Andrew C. Belden, PhD, an assistant professor of child psychiatry. "In this study, we were interested in learning whether preschoolers also had that blunted response to reward, and in fact, the brains of children as young as 4 showed very similar responses. That's consistent with other findings in that many neurobehavioral aspects of depression remain consistent throughout the lifespan."

Related: Strategy found for safely prescribing antidepressants to children and adolescents

The research, involving 84 children, was conducted as part of a larger study of clinical depression in children ages 3 to 7. The principal investigators of that larger study, which includes therapy and functional brain scanning, are Luby and Deanna M. Barch, PhD, chair of Washington University's Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences in Arts & Sciences and the Gregory B. Couch Professor of Psychiatry at the School of Medicine.
The children wore a device that resembles a shower cap but is hooked to wires that measure electrical activity in the brain using an electroencephalogram machine (EEG). Then, the children played a computer game that involved choosing between two doors shown on the screen. Choosing one door won them points, but choosing the other resulted in a loss of points.
Researchers have tested this idea in adults and teens by allowing them to win cash. In this study, however, young children who picked the correct door enough times won a toy that they were able to pick from a basket of figures, balls and plush items they had been shown before the computer session began.

Learn More: Brain imaging shows how children inherit their parents’ anxiety

While the brains of clinically depressed children responded similarly to those of nondepressed children when points were lost, the response when the correct door was chosen was blunted.
"The EEG results showed that their brains did not react as robustly from the pleasurable event of choosing the correct door on the screen," Belden said. "It was not that their brains somehow overreacted to making the wrong choice. The brains of both depressed and nondepressed children reacted the same way to making the wrong choice. The differences we observed were specific to the reward response."
Luby and Belden next plan to see whether the blunted response to reward changes after treatment.
"It may or may not normalize," said Luby, the Samuel and Mae S. Ludwig Professor of Child Psychiatry. "But we suspect the reward response will improve."
Luby and Belden said that when a very young child doesn't seem to be excited by rewards, such as toys and gifts, it may be a sign that the child is depressed or prone to depression. If the condition persists, they suggest parents talk to a pediatrician.

Don't Miss: Brain structure governing emotion is passed down from mother to daughter, says study

"There are clear risk factors," Luby explained. "Decreased ability to enjoy activities and play is a key sign. Kids who feel excessively guilty about wrongdoing and those who experience changes in sleep and appetite also may be at risk. If they're persistently sad, irritable or less motivated, those are markers that may indicate depression, even in kids as young as 3 or 4, and we would recommend that parents get them evaluated."
Note: Material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis   Original reporting by: Jim Dryden

Publication

Beldon AC et al. Neural Correlates of Reward Processing in Depressed and Healthy Preschool-Age Children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Published December 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.503

Ecology! Good Times

"Mercy, Mercy Me (The Ecology)"

Woo ah, mercy mercy me
Ah things ain't what they used to be, no no
Where did all the blue skies go?
Poison is the wind that blows from the north and south and east
Woo mercy, mercy me, mercy father
Ah things ain't what they used to be, no no
Oil wasted on the ocean and upon our seas, fish full of mercury
Ah oh mercy, mercy me
Ah things ain't what they used to be, no no
Radiation under ground and in the sky
Animals and birds who live nearby are dying
Oh mercy, mercy me
Ah things ain't what they used to be
What about this overcrowded land
How much more abuse from man can she stand?
Oh, na na...
My sweet Lord... No
My Lord... My sweet Lord 

Kisses

Benedito Ubirata da Silva

A mutilating is analogous to an arsonist

Today saw Germany's pictures in a German magazine, I saw Cologne. I remembered some friends I knew in the 80s We from time to time was in the public design workshops (painting nudes). And every time the coffee break, we stopped to chat. The main subject was always what more we worry, or so called our attention. And in one afternoon what he called our attention were films almost documentaries. He spent a film that seemed a lesson for those who would be tempted to enter the world of criminal investigation.They very intelligent, thought strange, human behavior, and analyzed like any ordinary human being, but were influenced by the film to be criminal investigators just because they are women and see the day to day newspaper pages in police matters, that women were becoming increasingly vulnerable.I that day was quiet, peaceful. We are not always inspired.So I explain the sense that many times a movie has the influence of an institution of any rich country.It is not always looking for new supporters. But always the factor of teaching the reader or viewer, that the problem should be referred to the level of taking care. but not hysterical care. But the to collaborate care. Fear of government institutions fall in the law of silence, as we speak in street slang. Where the institutions end up running out of witnesses. No employees worried about their country or region. Finding that veiling the crime, can be protected for life.then I quoted some very old movies, that was perceived institution as Scotland Yard, sponsoring films or books like Agatha Christie, which show that the cooperation of society makes the institution has a faster and more practical purpose.Among the crimes that leave women vulnerable and this led her to see that maybe she was not worried about being a researcher recruited for a good placement of the request of the institution collaboration. I mentioned two types of crimes, which even if not vulnerable, movies, and books were engaging and just learning a little.And then I introduced the risks to a company of a place that has Scotland Yard.The cases of mutilating and raping.And then I introduced as via the hypothesis of institution and concern.A mutilating is analogous to an arsonist.He always needs to show that it is violent and truculent. And it always comes back to see if the victim is cornered and afraid. It is the main modus operandi, parallel or analogous to the arsonist. The incendiary, always back to see the fire. I learned that in my childhood by Britannic school. Scotland Yard as I mentioned, always puts on films, documentaries these parameters.The problem is that the mutilating is a rare case in humans. Not that the arsonist is not uncommon. But it takes an arsonist to be incendiary often not dementia. In a documentary, then in 1969, they made a point of showing several films of police type, where the arsonists were not demented, but people who wanted to take advantage of the legal system, and gain the legal oversight at the time of expertise. Win after losing in fire the gains you have made the fire. The financial scheme to earn the insurance policy. It was a period in which firefighters had films, had chances to show the world with lectures its value and how much should be public collaboration, not in the case of calls them. But not to get in the way. People wanting to see the fire, sometimes hinders more than imagine a fireman.

Returning, the mutilating is not a common criminal. the films show the schizophrenic side, the psychotic side. When you show it, it would be to show a quiet population in a movie. It would show that the medical logic, the numbers are small in the world population. Numbers would be almost 1 million for 1 person.One sees the film, suffers, and then gets quiet that in their society does not have many. I could only have a maximum of 1 or 2 who escaped.This is the biggest problem institutions as MI 16, or Scotland Yard, I said to her. When they begin to teach that there is a kind of crime, and this crime is rare. they are perhaps wanting to collaborate population that does not increase. ie, be sure to increase.When you start to see many criminals of the same type of crime, the problem is that it must have a school that is worshiping, producing more than normal. The fruit is problematic for a rich country. Mainly because they are criminals deemed insane.The question would be: Why demented are increasing?A stimulus Criminological Research. Or a spur Medical Research, Sociological.A well built response time may be within the population, and not within the institution, which in turn has endless criminal cases to see.Sometimes, a Scientist, a Doctor, or Sociologist or Historian or Biologist, or even why not Nuclear Physical, may have the answer. There is the classic case of the British Army in the 19th century war with the natives in South Africa. They did not understand how they with cannons, training rules, and well armed, were defeated by unarmed natives, coming against the danger, visible that would make anyone stop. They found with Biochemical collaboration, and Botanicals that the natives were violent because they were drugged with a derivative that they could isolate the native plants of the region.Collaboration is encouraged when the institution shows the problem that people do not like to see. They are the people outside the closed institution. Just feel the crime. They open their files and lets writers, editors, writers do novels, essays, and documentaries to see his the public may have an answer.
 I tell her to always observe this topic. Otherwise they, Scotland Yard did not bother to link this kind of education for children, adolescents and adults in the decade 60-80.Going back to the initial problem of the conversation, I explained well by my angle of view:If leaves mutilating are important, not only to say they are criminals. And yes, say, to let them win is let them be winners. If winners are culture changes.Children and young people will want to be mutilating, raping, passionate criminals, and this is wrong.Please note that children and young people, although not appear because they are impulsive, impetuous, they risk more than adults. When there is the presence of the dark. They are fragile. Is the meaning of us wanting more give protection.We defend them, because we remember our nightmare nights, fear, horror. And it's always good time we have someone who saves us.And they turn for wanting to risk, they will always use the example.The incentive not to let a criminal beat with his usual crime, is because more young people can fall in risk society.His youth wanting to follow suit because they feel fear.

 The hysteria perfect for those who want to change the culture. Would be to fear too much, youth wanting to protect someone like following example.If what influences hysteria, leads the population to fear, and it is a criminal, he will get many young people fall in the risk of going against wanting to be like them, not to enter the risk of being victims.In psychology there is the term Stalker.The stalker is not only a rapist, one mutilating. He also wants to make faithful, to protect in your paranoia of wanting to be normal.

The Scotland Yard would fear to have a number of people becoming worms.And begin to spread worms to do more, because each has the shame of being "alone worms."It would be "many" trying to hide who made it. Since the laws define it is a crime and do not want to get chain.A mutilating trying to hide the crime, a problem observed him in concern. It is all the time trying to hide the crime committed.Deduce a lot of people who mutilating Culture produced, start not want to be defined as criminal, not to catch chain. It would be uncontrolled. The imbalance!(Advantage:.. What is learned in documentaries, it is that mutilating leave traces It's easy to find them They fall into psychosis, and will leave traces of attempt to erase the crime committed)The problem and disadvantage arises if ... they leave traces, and sports!It is because someone wants a culture.This practice and then demonstrates the success (try to observe examples where there really is a demonstration a method of explanation), the victory that the crime became the winner.Enticing.Then I asked: You're still worried about being taken to be a researcher, or ... You're worried about the institution factor want a response that round your city?She smiled.I said: The worst thing is if mutilating is "taken" to be an icon.coffee we left and went back to the studio to draw in summer late afternoon.Then she offered me the invitation to take and go to Cologne. I laughed!Now is the time of admission to university, and examinations are heavy. Unfortunately, I can not accept the invitation.She smiled again. And he showed a case.That was a few weeks after the conversation.It was a couple fighting in the street.

I looked in silence. And we laughed.

She looked at me and said. This is the answer, absurd. I can not see naturally.
I laughed and said: It worries me sometimes.

She left. And I went to ticket more try at the university (By the way it worked, just entering the university two years later, but I was without my conversation with smart German women  in the late afternoons.)

Good times was in 1988.

Hugs 
Benedito Ubirata da Silva

Not a "mechanical sexual freedom"

"Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life."- Ludwig van Beethoven

I see this picture I just keep remembering, the junior high school in 1976 when they began to criticize Beethoven.Today seeing the figure above shows, I begin to understand that they were people who did not, that the population had a sexual freedom, with pleasure and happiness (with feelings that lead you to have good memories).Years later explained that only criticism was because those who criticized disliked Beethoven's genius to create a way to reduce their deafness by invented device; the metal bar pressed against the inner ear (he found that the metal  reverberated vibration of piano strings, touching the metal on the ropes and in the inner ear, a long metal bar).Seeing so explained to me years later 70's, in my opinion these people are strange because they took metal rage, and so was the explanation, but actually I found out for myself, they loved to say that the metal Beethoven they hated the ingenious discovery, was the meaning that they worshiped the semi metal.They loved the semi metal! And they decided to criticize Beethoven's invention to be metal.At the end of strange by worshiping the semi metal (lithium, sodium, potassium, etc., and acada one by Merck manual on veterinary or medicine, these are applied to living beings lack the ills ranging from cardiac problems to cancer) ; turning the figure they still did not like sexuality with pleasure.It follows that also did not like good music, and irritating noise only.In the end Beethoven was the good part of Romanticism, a music school not understood yet.Always said the romantic composers (of romanticism school) were tiring by the end wanting dramas, role plays in the life of each one drama of solitary love, dreamy, platonic.Seeing what Beethoven is expressed, is closer to what the people wanted in the 60: Not a "mechanical sexual freedom", but what he wrote and appears next to the figure. And very different from the vision left on the romantic school in the 80s.You do not see the attempt of characters who attempt suicide feel so much romanticism in his thinking because of one person or more.

Hugs

Benedito Ubirata da Silva