The call in the 70's in the end, I worked in company Italian multinational, was a pharmaceutical company, I was teen and worked 15 years in the department of data processing with a computer called Honewell Bull, I started to learn computing. I studied in high school, and my head was boiling in information. everything was bland was always in contact with new calls, translated and passed very well personally. they came ready and succinct little time he had a chance to talk some more. Then I went to mue group of friends (which unfortunately I had a good default, had several throughout the city) and discuss exactly these issues with them. One of the calls that concerned me most and has evolved until I choose not to psychology, was Burnout. Where I was at the Italian company was employee feedback about burnout. They just said about people who had sick leave for burnout. I was always careful about that. My recommendation is that I created was to travel. (If I've learned or created in the dark silence I do not know) But when I felt I was traveling near the burnout. Years later I read an immune to it. So within the friendship group of people came to the new call that was the Depression. I told myself immune, so I started hitting me with it stage by stage. Until I learned that depression is not fatigue. Needed to learn about how to become immune to depression. I always read books with authors who wrote and described the East Asia, the Buddhists. I decided to become a Buddhist, because I did not want to be a psychologist just to understand me, I decided that Buddhism had what I needed. Meditation. When he was in a meditation better than the doctors with their medicine. I left my upset because there was no prevention. I said in burnout because traveling is immune prevention. But for depression there is no prevention. Today I would say that I discovered another prevention. Physicians for a Depression Stress prevention, a call shortly after the call of Burnout. I laughed. I induced in my mind that if you do not swindles not make it to stress. It took me a long time with depression within the environment in the 90s. Conflict with a new technology that influenced the mind, depression led me to experience stress. In the new call schizophrenia, I did well. Because in 2002 I decided to take matter to me degree in education, and the need to do college work, the library, I just read an article. Explaining that the epilepsy report was based on depression. I could not get schizophrenia. Because even in the environment, or anyone if I stay away from stress, environmental schizophrenia could not reach. But the so-called schizophrenia environment I wanted to learn, not prcisou walk the corridors of the hospice or the offices of psychologists that whenever I showed up they told me to go since the 90's by saying that I had no problems whatsoever. I was insistent and I think that each phase was about 4 different psychologists as well as always being close to the Institute of Psychology. But the environment has been called schizophrenia persist. And I began to conflict because I could not talk about young people's time as build built for me calls. The conflict grew until teaching in 2007, the problems have improved. The conflict has decreased and the need to see psychiatrists and psychologists over. Schizophrenia environmental was have an answer for me. Within a Scientific American article. Or article caught my attention because I do not have a theme to give my students to build an interdisciplinary character with writing since I was a substitute teacher of organic chemistry of them. I needed a text interdisciplinary organic chemistry and biology. And text appeared in Scientific American that was the real gift. The identification with the text came to me regardless of class, because it was hot topic with a friend from university who had his work theme RNA. We talked about her work in the blood of patients with pulmonary infections at a university near my house. She was the university I studied and used the collected but the university laboratories close to my house. And the magazine article was very easy to understand. I remembered the issues and answer my questions. What came first the DNA or RNA. And throughout the article described the problem of keeping the code described in RNA to its end for the construction. The students had their work theme that helped him understand organic chemistry and the problem of human reproduction in biology. They just need to read and do a review, the rest we would discuss the measure we were having classes in organic chemistry. For me it was important they see the complex of RNA and DNA but they never would for example the importance of learning the format description of amines and amides. Has any base. But the peace of mind and emotional and spiritual, came when I saw the article I responded on the environment as a conceptual schizophrenia. Without you think about nuclear disaster. That is, if the DNA building the environmental code of schizophrenia had contact RNA to bring the code to nominate its construction of the road suffered a single disorder could make the protein Schizophrenia. At the time a nuclear disaster would be enough to generate a confusion in the construction of RNA and protein to the cell. The RNA would come disorganized abnormal protein, the cell would be the modification of human behavior. she would now be a cell with genetic traits of schizophrenia. The cancer has this problem. Schizophrenia could trace this path. But the years passed and completed nuclear disasters was still very strong and very weak. Because a disaster could not only make the mismatch of the set of atoms RNA molecule, as if it were too strong could do the destruction. Would that be something less than the destructive and strong enough to make small modifications. The disruption of RNA molecules is as difficult as breaking fat into energy, proteins are large but disorganized one atom is enough to change their characteristics and outcome. But one characteristic that is modified small changes can lead to the end of the cell body and its function and then behavior. The article below, shows another connection and continuity to me that I read the article SBPC (Brazilian society research and science - Magazine "Ciencia Hoje"), which was written in the 90s. Depression that had a link with epilepsy. But he also shows this link with epilepsy and schizophrenia. Then I'd say a slight environmental influences on the line of the genetic code of DNA to RNA to protein to produce schizophrenia or depression. If we made a graph, could put the protein in the center of epilepsy in the human body if there was a basis for this code. And then a single malfunction in the production code on Schizophrenia and Depression and the other around the epilepsy report. Depending on the influences could give the diversion of construction genetic depression or epilepsy. We have today in my mind many environmental influences that are not only the nuclear disaster for changes. Something like a disaster or environmental imbalance chemistry, biochemistry could cause the code to the environmental influences that RNA carries. Consider the text of Scientific American, he denounces the question about which came first the DNA or RNA? if we see that the possibility of exchange of one or the other on the idea which came first, then we can infer that DNA is the base to the RNA, the RNA could be the basis for future DNA. The DNA in the body is not eternal. When it was built or replace the ancient DNA, even if it was tough making the old code, if their RNAs were deconstructed in the way of an influence before arriving at the Ribosome to build protein. An hour of this construction would work for the modified DNA sequence of modified RNAs. Consider the replacement of the old DNA is modified by the risk of not having a reliable basis to ensure that RNA had the primary code of DNA. In other words, DNA makes RNA and has the consciousness that his successors will do the inserted RNA. RNA that comes through the next DNA. If a sequence of RNA to produce different proteins than RNA wanted to have the time to do a DNA DNA without the guarantee of RNAs that would prime DNA. If the DNA produces an RNA loaded code that produce proteins that lead to epilepsy. If a modifier sequence that occurs is small, epilepsy is no longer epilepsy. Is it something that can be linked around. Everyone around has its primary design. Chemistry would be an observation of the heroine - Morfine, of the amino acid - AMINA. A single change in the whole of Amina transforms into another type of amino acids. Returning once again changed the code of the RNAs produce epilepsy report their resulting proteins, but when the DNAs were produced to be replaced they would not have a basis. Their RNAs produced cells that produced so different DNAs. A stage in the evolution. A mutation. Paleontology that would be easier to observe. For the historical period I have small complex bodies. A genetic disorder in these small bodies produce new modified bodies. When they reproduce bodies produce modified with modified DNA. But it would be a modification corpuscular. Playback. In paleontology would be ideal because they are small bodies and in world history I tenhoa bulk catastrophic events that could show a decline in the production of RNAs. For example, a DNA producing their RNAs usually take an ice age in the beginning, or a meteor fall near each other, heavily laden with radiation. That would make an influence on DNA and its construction of RNAs. The base has been lost over the modification would not be as Darwin demonstrates corpuscular evolving. But paleontologists but genetics, evolution corpuscular something less. If we had a specimen with epilepsy in the DNA code, and this has environmental action of the fall of a radioactive meteor near the body. This would change the design of the RNA. Or a change in the code designed by the RNA and DNA in a change of the code at the time of RNAs and protein production of a differentiation of the protein before. Events as may exist paleontology. Help to understand? For example, described the Russian idea of modeling the growth of direct sunlight. It is followed by explosions and electromagnetic anomalies, these explosions suceed the interference in the Earth system. The anomaly is an example of electromagnetic solar anomaly. But there are anomalies in the rate of cosmic rays, gamma rays more. All influence in terrestrial systems. From the artificial to the natural. If we take the anomalous event dysfunction last year's big sunspot is modified with a large solar flare. Obvious influences that sparked a flame in the atmosphere for example. Or the geomagnetic Earth system, or electronic systems. All influence our system corpuscular We can, living a moment paleontology. We would have to relive the database for children born in 2010. Not to mention the future of these Darwinian to mate in the future and create new human would have to see if a genetic level from 2009 to 2010 there was a slight non-genetically modified. A modification that would generate a replacement based on the future of DNA in your body. For the two levels of paleontology would have drawn in the future, a genetic body and another for playback. In 20 years all the combinations would play a very small change in the future geologic time, but great for older models of scientific understanding. Why? Data are needed. Now we produce the database in blood (Mitochondrial DNA) by the millions. But a paleontological expedition would have no more than a thousand global view if we had a good conversation between scientists around the world based on stratigraphic good time. Would have to get a reliable period, that this gives enough samples and worldwide have these stratigraphic ranges. And then the collection would be done. And would you describe the vision and genetics to the study of catastrophic event similar to the present. The analysis would be parallel. The text below is instructive. Deserves due attention.
Good Week
Benedito Ubirata
No comments:
Post a Comment